Sunday, 11 February 2024

What is a certificate of sponsorship?

 Any migrant worker who wants to apply through a relevant worker route must have a Certificate of Sponsorship, or COS, which is an electronic certificate.

Without initially obtaining a Certificate of Sponsorship, applicants who wish to pursue the skilled worker path are unable to register their visa or get authorization. This is a result of the application form requiring the submission of a certain reference number.

Processing Time for Sponsorship Certificate

Having a valid sponsor licence is one of the prerequisites for applying for a visa under the Worker and Temporary Worker categories. This is a crucial step in the application process for a visa. The applicant must be able to provide proof of a job offer from a firm that is allowed to conduct business in the United Kingdom before the Home Office would consider issuing a visa.

When an employer offers a Certificate of Sponsorship to a specific candidate, they certify to the Home Office that the planned employment conditions meet the requirements of the applicable visa application route, according to an UAE immigration lawyer in UK.

The approval procedure for a Certificate of Sponsorship typically takes one business day to finish. This deadline, nevertheless, can be extended if the Home Office asks for further details to be included in the submitted data.

The certificate will become available in the employer's Sponsor Management System (SMS) account upon authorization, at which point it will be delivered to the approved skilled worker. A sponsor licence is a prerequisite for an employer to be eligible to provide a Certificate of Sponsorship. This licence gives the company the ability to hire qualified foreign workers legitimately after they have filed a visa application.

Sponsorship Permit for COS Issuance

Employers need to have access to SMS and a valid sponsor licence in order to be eligible for a Certificate of Sponsorship. Only those with Level 1 or Level 2 SMS access may issue a COS.

The necessary role information should be entered into the SMS by the sponsor's chosen Level 1 or Level 2 client. A unique COS reference number will then be provided.

You Can Allocate a New Certificate for Up to Three Months

Sponsorship certificates may be distributed up to three months prior to the migration's commencement date. Upon acceptance, the defined certificates will appear in the SMS account, which the employer may assign to the employee right away.

How Can Issuing COS Be Done Without Delays?

The quantity of specified COS requests that required more time to approve than the usual one working day limit has increased significantly. Here are some ideas to help you prevent delays:

Examine the provided data thoroughly. It is essential that you provide accurate information while filling out the relevant sections of your application.

Be ready to be questioned for further details. Following the submission of a request by SMS, the Home Office will review it and could inquire for further details on the position mentioned in the application.

Answer within the allotted period. The Home Office will let you know the deadline if they need more information.

While decisions on petitions are often made within a day, there may be delays.

Sponsorship Cost Certificate

For each Certificate of Sponsorship a sponsor gives to a migrant worker, the employer is obligated to pay a fee. The exact amount that you must pay depends depend on the kind of sponsor licence that you submit. If your company meets the requirements, you may be able to pay the £536 licencing application fee. In order to apply for a worker sponsor permit as a medium or large sponsor, £1,476 is the total sponsor licencing payment.

Sponsorship Cost Certificate

For each Certificate of Sponsorship a sponsor gives to a migrant worker, the employer is obligated to pay a fee. The exact amount that you must pay depends depend on the kind of sponsor licence that you submit. If your company meets the requirements, you may be able to pay the £536 licencing application fee. In order to apply for a worker sponsor permit as a medium or large sponsor, £1,476 is the total sponsor licencing payment.

A competent worker can get a Certificate of Sponsorship for £199. If the foreign national wants to apply to be a temporary worker or an international athlete (for a maximum of 12 months), the cost is £21.

Get to know the latest changes in the family visas

 It is widely recommended by top immigration law firms in London to apply sooner rather than later, with legal assistance, if your prospective UK immigration applications may be affected by the developments listed below. This is simply in case something goes wrong the first time.

The family visa minimum income threshold will continue to rise.

In the spring of 2024, the minimum income required for a British national or settled person to bring their spouse into the country on a family visa will increase from £18,600 to £29,000. The requirement for British or settled partners to prove they can support an applicant for a family visa to live with them in the UK will continue to rise gradually, the Government has now confirmed, eventually catching up with the minimum income requirement for skilled worker visas in early 2025. The minimum income criterion may rise to even greater levels by early 2025, although it will remain at £38,700 this spring.

This year's election will determine if the next government wants to maintain the current high income criterion for proving a settled partner can support their loved one, as per the top immigration law firms in London.

The government maintains that candidates will still be allowed to use their funds to satisfy the current minimal income criteria. To meet the minimum income criteria, an applicant's sponsor's cash savings, their own cash savings, or the combined cash savings of both, may be applied. However, the maximum amount that can be applied is £62,500, which is now required for a pair to be granted a two-and-a-half-year visa for a partner without children. (Note: Since this is based on the existing £18,600 level, the new cash savings need may be greater.)

To the relief of many, those who already have a family visa, were awarded a fiancĂ© visa prior to the threshold hike, or applied before the upcoming income threshold increase this spring, will still have their visa applications evaluated based on the current £18,600 criteria.

Immigration Health Surcharge was increased.

The Immigration Health Surcharge, which is required for the majority of visa applicants, is expected to rise from £624 to £1,035 year (or from £470 to £776 annually for youth mobility workers, students, and children).

If it passed through Parliament in time, the rise in the cost to utilize the National Health Service was scheduled to go into effect on January 16. Since it will take effect in 21 days, the earliest it may currently occur is early February.

Most students and carers are not permitted to have dependents.

The ability to bring family members into the UK on sponsored work visas will no longer be available to caregivers, particularly elderly caregivers. Before the changes go into effect, those who were already on this immigration route are still able to bring dependents to the UK when they seek for settlement, renew their visa, or move employers as long as they stay in the same SOC.Nevertheless, workers in the UK under any other immigration pathway, including one that allows dependents, who convert to the Skilled Worker category as caregivers after the regulations alter will not be allowed to remain with (or bring over) dependents, potentially upsetting already-united families. This will all be implemented “as soon as possible”

Additionally, starting in January 2024, non-EU students will not be permitted to enter the UK with dependents unless they are engaged in a postgraduate study that is classified as a research program. Programs that involve original work production and have a research component, such as master's degrees or PhDs, are eligible. This ban will be in effect for all foreign students enrolled in classes beginning on January 1, 2024.

The end of Sole Representative Visa – Changes in Immigration Guidelines

 The only representative, or Representative of Overseas Business, visa route is affected by the most significant changes. After the Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) visa was closed, the path gained popularity, therefore it is to be expected that the Home Office is trying to tighten the screws.

Most significant alterations:

Applications will now contain a "genuineness assessment," which will determine if the single representative truly plans to abide by the Rules. The applicant's ability to "genuinely" meet the requirements will now be evaluated subjectively by the Home Office/UKVI, according to the top immigration lawyers in UK.

The branch or subsidiary cannot be "established solely for the purpose of facilitating the entry and stay of the applicant," according to the most recent version of the Rules.

According to the Rules, the candidate must possess "relevant skills, experience, and business knowledge." Naturally, the Home Office will evaluate this in light of the presented evidence.

The regulations that formerly confined sole representative visa applications to majority shareholders alone no longer allow partners of someone holding a majority shareholding to apply. This modification was anticipated and fixes a glaring error in the initial draft.

A senior employee of an international firm may enter the UK with a Sole Representative of an Overseas Business visa in order to establish and manage a UK branch or wholly-owned subsidiary of the international parent company.  After five years, the Representative of an Overseas Business visa category allows for the acquisition of indefinite permission to remain (ILR).

To be eligible for an Overseas Business visa as a Sole Representative, you must meet the requirements set forth by UK Visas and Immigration regarding your foreign company.

  • is a trading company that operates internationally;
  • has its main office and headquarters outside of the United Kingdom;
  • possesses no other operating branch, affiliate, or agent within the United Kingdom;
  • plans to open a fully-owned subsidiary or registered branch in the UK that will engage in active trading in the same industry as the foreign company;
  • The lone representative will not be selected or the overseas business founded primarily to facilitate the sole representative's admission or stay;
  • intends to keep its offshore operations center.

Modifications to Innovation and Startup Visas

The Home Office has always taken the stance that the endorsing bodies should handle the business assessment because that is their area of competence, ever since the Start-Up and Innovator visa paths were established. Once the endorsement has been obtained, the Home Office will make the final application decision. This was a much-needed shift, especially in light of the way that Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) visas were being unfairly denied for many years.

Regretfully, this assessment division is currently coming to an end. Now that the endorsing requirements have been met, the Home Office can request additional information and supporting documentation from the endorsing body as well as the applicant. Should the decision-maker determine that the requirements have not been met, the application may be denied. The goal of the endorsing bodies is somewhat defeated by this modification, since the Home Office will now further encroach on the evaluation of the business's viability—an area of competence that we all too well know they lack.

The ability of higher education institutions to recommend applicants for both innovator and startup visas is a more positive trend. It appears that the Home Office was "concerned" about how the universities might recommend applicants for Innovator visas, so they proactively granted themselves more authority to investigate applications further even after the recommendation had obtained.

The Conclusion

The stated modifications made it abundantly evident that the Home Office wishes to maintain the authority to evaluate applicants in a subjective manner and reject applications that the officer in charge of making decisions deems unworthy. Immigration lawyers will be very afraid of those changes because refusal rates always rise when the Home Office adds new subjective standards to its application evaluation process. With the now-closed Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) visa path and its historical above 50% refusal rate for all applicants, this was all too evident.

Are you aware of the latest rules for overseas students coming to UK in 2024?

 Changes to the UK student visa regulations will take effect on January 1, 2024, and would prevent overseas students from entering the country with their dependent spouse or children unless they are enrolled in a PhD or postgraduate research program. This is in response to modifications made to the regulations governing student visas on July 17, 2023, which provide that those transferring to a UK work visa must have finished their course of study and have a job start date that falls after their course completion. Additionally, before converting to a work visa like a skilled worker visa, PhD candidates must have studied for a minimum of 24 months.

Is it possible to extend my student dependent visa after January 2024?

According to one of the top 10 immigration solicitors in London, you can continue to extend your dependent visa for as long as the primary student visa holder—your partner or parent—has a valid visa—as long as they began their studies prior to January 1, 2024. The new regulations regarding dependents on student visas are only applicable to courses beginning after January 1, 2024.

Can my family submit an application for a dependent visa after I move to a PSW visa?

Your partner and children can still apply for a dependent visa to stay in the UK with you if you intend to go from a student visa to a post-study work visa (PSW), also called a UK graduate visa. Recall that this is only permitted under the terms of the Graduate visa if your partner and kids have been living with you in the UK as your dependents for the duration of your studies.

Can I move from a dependent visa to a work visa in the UK?

Yes, you can change to a work visa (such as a skilled worker visa) if you are currently residing in the UK on a student dependent visa, but you will need to fulfill the requirements of the new visa. You can become independent of your partner's or parent's immigration status and be allowed to stay in the UK by converting your student dependent visa to a UK worker visa. Parents of children on student visas are the lone exception, as they are unable to convert to a skilled worker visa.

In order to change your visa status from student dependent to skilled worker, you need to:

  • Possess a job offer that qualifies from an employer licensed by the UK
  • Fulfill the minimum wage standards (which, as of this writing in December 2023, are £10.75 per hour or the "going rate" for your occupation), as well as
  • Fulfill the standards for proficiency in the English language, such as having a level B1 proficiency in the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) assessment of reading, writing, speaking, and comprehension.

Continuous Residence Requirement

One may satisfy the 5-year continuous residency requirement by using any of the following visas:

  • Representative of a visa for foreign business
  • A visa for the sole representative of an overseas company
  • Visa for a representative of a news agency, broadcasting organization, or overseas newspaper

According to the continuous residence regulations, in order to be eligible for ILR, you have to have worked full-time for your foreign company or the UK branch you founded. Therefore, in order to be eligible for Sole Representative ILR, you must not have worked for another company or run your own business while you were in the UK.

Is your online business entity protected by the Online Safety Act?

 With the October passage of the Online Safety Bill into law (the "Act"), the Office of Communications (Ofcom) was given extensive authority to oversee internet service providers. Important information about the legal framework of the Act will be made public during stakeholder interaction and consultation for the secondary laws, guidelines, and codes of practice that will support it.

The government projected—possibly conservatively—that 25,100 tech enterprises would fall under the purview of the new internet regulatory framework in its Impact Assessment. Many smaller to mid-size tech platform providers—such as online forums, gaming sites, social media platforms, and blogging platforms—are likely to be required to comply with the new regulatory regime, even though the Act's primary goal is to establish a new regulatory regime primarily to address illegal and harmful content online accessed via the "Big Tech" platforms.

The Act mandates the following online service providers to comply with legal requirements:

Services between users. This has to do with companies that offer "internet services" that let consumers "encounter content," or material created, uploaded, or shared by other users.

  1. A service that is made available online or through a combination of the internet and an electronic communications service is referred to as a "internet service." As a result, it includes a wide range of services, such as apps, websites, and other software. Whether payment and/or a subscription are necessary in order to use the service is irrelevant.
  2. b) The term "encounter content" refers to the act of reading, seeing, hearing, or engaging in any other way with content transmitted by an internet service, whether in a public or private setting. This content can include written texts, voice conversations, photos, videos, music, and data of any kind. Thus, a service that allows users to see and send audio-visual content from other users or send direct messages via instant/private messaging services will be classified as a user-to-user service.

c) A service will be classified as user-to-user as long as it contains features that enable content exchange between users, regardless of whether this sharing actually occurs.

d) The percentage of user-generated material on the platform is likewise irrelevant. As an illustration, the Act will nonetheless apply to a website that has distinct online forum features that allow users to communicate and publish, even though these features are only a small part of the overall functioning of the website.

2. Services for searching. This has to do with companies that offer search services and/or search engines that let consumers look up content on numerous websites and databases according to various commercial law firms in UK.

a) The Act defines a "search service" as the widely accepted concept of a search engine, such as Google or Bing, but the definition also covers services offered by virtual assistants, like "Siri" and "Alexa."

  • The Act only applies to search services that let users search several databases or websites. Relevant search services include those that allow you to browse through a list of items, enter search terms into a search box, and/or filter content using tags or metadata.

3. Services featuring pornography. This pertains to any internet service provider that posts or shows non-user-generated pornographic content.

Regulation of foreign-based internet services

To be classified as a provider of user-to-user, search, or pornographic services, an online service provider needs to have "links with the UK." In actuality, it is simple to get beyond that obstacle because any business that may be accessed by individuals in the UK, has a target market comprised of UK users, or has a sizable number of UK users will be considered to have "links with the UK."

The Act considers user-to-user, search, and pornographic services to be "Regulated Services," unless they come under one of the exclusions listed below. This is provided that the relevant services have links with the UK. Ofcom will now be able to take necessary legal action against any Regulated Service provider, regardless of their location.

Role of Artificial Intelligence in Divorce

 AI is obviously permeating all aspect of our lives, whether you ask Alexa to add anything to your shopping list or use Chat GPT to assist you in starting a blog. Although exact numbers vary depending on where you look, data indicates that the majority of UK homes own smart home appliances, and many of them include voice-activated assistants. This kind of technology is commonplace for kids growing up in the UK today, and when they become older, they'll expect to see it used in all spheres of society. A majority of clients now perceive artificial intelligence (AI) as a reality rather than the science fiction idea it previously was, especially those of the future.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is already being applied by most legal firms in London, notably in the field of financial remedies. Open source banking-based AI is being used to evaluate financial data and produce asset schedules and budgets. AI-powered legal research tools and meeting notes generated by video conferencing software are two further ways technology is beginning to permeate daily office life. The question of whether analysis of historical financial data from prior settlements may be utilised to forecast a range of potential outcomes for future cases is also being discussed at the industry level. Although people are eager to see what may be done, they are hesitant to depend too heavily on this given the vast amount of judgement required to equitably satisfy the requirements of all families.

Of course, artificial intelligence has a darker side, and while we work to discover how it may help our clients, we also need to be aware of its limits in order to keep them safe. We all need to be aware of deepfakes and the ease with which regular people may use AI to alter and improve documents, photos, and videos. Additionally, we must make sure that the data is maintained current, comprehend what is being brought into the pertinent AI programmes we are utilising, and be aware of any potential bias.

But it doesn't seem possible, in my opinion, that family attorneys and judges will entirely be supplanted by robots. Lawyers are there to offer strategic and sophisticated guidance during a tough emotional period in a system where there are always outlier cases and factual circumstances. Judges must exercise their wide discretion to ensure that demands are met fairly. Compared to a simple numerical evaluation, such analysis is far more in-depth and sensitive. Machines lack emotional intelligence; humans provide it (for now, anyhow!). These are the reasons legal firms in London are unable to envision how kid arrangements work with similar technology at this time.

 However, it is evident that AI has the ability to be used in a way that will save time on some activities, especially in the beginning of cases when we are attempting to determine the amount of the parties' available assets, and lower legal expenses. In order to concentrate on offering our clients the unique value that only humans can provide, lawyers must use these technologies.

Moving from US to UK? Key consideration to think about

 The huge and turbulent Atlantic Ocean separates the United States and the United Kingdom. People having ties to both nations will frequently find themselves struggling to maintain their position between two intricately diverse and powerful administrations. They may safely negotiate the cross-border obstacles and take full use of the planning possibilities if they receive the appropriate expert help.

Relocating to the United Kingdom

The top law firms in London discuss some of the most important factors to take into account for US residents who are relocating to the UK for the first time in this instalment.

How to handle double taxation

People will be liable to UK taxation on their international income and gains after they become tax residents in the UK (subject to the remittance basis of taxation, detailed below). Unlike individuals relocating from most other jurisdictions, US citizens are subject to US income tax on their global income and profits. There is a chance of double taxation as a result.

Income tax treaty and the associated relief

Relief from double taxation is intended to be provided by the US-UK double taxation agreement, sometimes referred to as the "income tax treaty." In general, the treaty works by dividing up the taxation powers between the two nations and, to the degree that each has the authority to tax, by establishing a system of credits that permits taxes paid in one nation to be deducted from obligations incurred in the other.

The dual exposure can have a substantial impact on the tax-efficiency of some investment types, even though double taxation can generally be avoided by using the treaty. For instance, an asset may be treated favourably for US tax purposes but be subject to higher tax rates in the UK. US mutual funds that lack "reporting" status in the UK are a prime example1. Profits from those investments will normally be subject to income tax rates in the UK (currently up to 45%), but capital gains rates in the US (now 20%). Because of this, US citizens may still find value in the UK's remittance basis of taxation.

Seeking advantage from the “non-dom” tax system

Remittance basis of taxation should be available to US citizens residing in the UK as long as they maintain a non-UK domicile for UK tax purposes. If they do this and the income and profits are not "remitted" to the UK—that is, transferred into or utilised within the country—they can avoid paying UK tax on their capital gains and income from various law firms in London.

When it is free, a lot of Americans will use the remittance basis for the first seven years of their UK residency. Compared to making a claim for treaty relief, this offers some administrative convenience. The taxpayer will need to do an annual mathematical exercise to determine the remittance basis beyond the seven-year mark, at which point an annual fee becomes due.

When the residual exposure to US taxes is considered, the worldwide tax savings may be insignificant, making it unfeasible for US citizens to pay to access the remittance basis in many circumstances. If taxpayers can afford not to remit the income or profits deriving from such assets to the UK, it may be advantageous for them to keep holdings in investments that are not tax-efficient in the UK.

To guarantee that tax credits are accessible, US citizens who want to claim the remittance basis will need to be more careful about when they make their tax payments and remittances. Due to the complexity of this accounting issue, users of US remittance bases will need professional counsel.