Myths about the effect of migrants on U.S Economy.

President Donald Trump has been instilling fears about immigrants in the days summing up to the midterm elections. His recent tweet discussed about anti-immigrant ads and susceptible to cancel birthright citizenship, something lawmakers on both sides of the line have said would be unconstitutional, as he campaigns to charge up Republican attendance.

For UK immigration lawyers, having a clear picture on this is utmost necessary so that they can provide necessary assistance to their clients. Let’s get to some widespread myths about the effect of immigration on U.S economy.

Myth #1: Immigrants get more from the U.S. government than they subsidise

Fact: Immigrants are known to pay more in tax revenue than they take in government schemes

A recent report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine found immigration “has an overall affirmative impact on the long-term economic growth in the U.S.”

First-generation immigrants tend to cost more to the government in comparison to native-born Americans— approx $1,600 per person annually. But second-generation immigrants are “among the sturdiest fiscal and economic donors in the U.S.,” the report revealed. They contribute about $1,700 per person annually. All other native-born Americans, inclusive of third-generation immigrants, are found to contribute $1,300 per year on average.

Myth #2: Immigrants snatch American jobs

Fact: Immigrants workers often get jobs that enhance other parts of the economy

Immigrants account for almost 17 percent of the U.S. labour force, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, but some UK immigration lawyers think that they’re snatching jobs from Americans, as Trump claims.

“Most economists agree to the point that in spite of being a major part of the labour force, immigrants have not come at the cost either of American jobs, nor of American wages,” Peri, the UC Davis professor, said.

The issue is that immigrants often get jobs that Americans generally not prefer to take. So rather than competing with Americans’ for jobs, immigrants are found to balance American workers.

Myth #3: The U.S. economy does not require immigrants

Fact: Immigrants are key to counterweighing a reducing birth rate

The birth rate in the U.S is 1.8 births per woman, low from 3.65 in 1960, as per a report from the World Bank. Demographers think that 2.1 births per woman as the rate required to replace the existing population.

As per the Pew Research Center, if not for immigrants, the U.S. workforce would be lessening. That would develop a range of problems for the federal setup.

Myth #4: It would be good for the economy if immigrants’ children were not considered citizens.

Fact: Children with citizenship are found to be more productive workers.

Research reveals that cancelling birthright citizenship could have major undesirable consequences for the U.S. economy as children who are citizens get more economic opportunity and depend less on government support.

A Migration Policy Institute analysis discloses the number of illegal immigrants would surge from 11 million to 16 million by 2050 if birthright citizenship were cancelled.