What to expect in an immigration related case?

 

A majority of folks cannot afford to pay for an immigration attorney to represent them in their lawsuit, so for them, their only option is to do it unconnectedly. While this is not the most preferred way to go forward, it assuredly is practicable to win your case without the help of London immigration lawyers. But before taking the reign on your hand, it is recommended to consult an immigration attorney to get your case checked and understand the steps in the lawsuit.

However, for general information, below are the elements that you can expect during immigration course proceedings.

All immigration proceedings start with service by an ICE officer of a Notice to Appear. You can discover a number of explanations that can be made about the notice to appear. First and most remarkably, if it is in fact a notice to appear that you have been served, the first page of the document will essentially convey “Notice to Appear” in bold in the upper right-hand side of the document. If it does not include such words, it is perhaps some other type of document. The Notice to Appear puts forth in numbered paragraphs the accusations by DHS against you – essentially these are pleadings which inform the immigration judge why you need to be deported and sent back to your native country. Before you attend your first immigration court hearing, it is necessary for you to read each of these allegations very prudently. Very often times these allegations are not disputed and the immigrant will just confess to each of these allegations at the first hearing. BUT this may not always be the situation. If you believe that any or all of these allegations are not correct, then it is up to you to reject these allegations at your first master calendar hearing and push the DHS prosecuting attorney to confirm the allegations made against you.

Besides quoting the factual allegations against you as to why you should be expelled from the United States, at the bottom of the Notice to Appear you will receive a reference to the legal ruling which the government is relying on to extradite you. Knowing this statute and how it associates to your case can sometimes be the most intricate part of your case, particularly if you are a permanent resident being deported as an outcome of pleading guilty to some crime. Often times immigration attorneys even have a difficult time understanding these removal statues and how they relate to corruptions. Inexpert London immigration lawyers often give trivial advice on these very complex legal matters.

If you prefer to challenge DHS’s factual and legal accusations against you, the immigration judge usually decides the matter in one of two ways: (1) they will ask the government to prove its case at the very first master calendar hearing; or (2) the immigration judge will schedule a new court date for what is known as a “contested master calendar hearing.” Often, immigration judges will go with the secondary choice as most immigration judges in the United States are pro DHS and will give DHS every opportunity likely to verify their case against you. DHS will use try to gather documents complementing elimination such as certified replicas of conviction records, I-213s and other legal paperwork.